Once an individual has accepted a position, it is unfair to enforce expectations that were not previously disclosed. Prospective employees should be fully informed of any expectations, particularly those that may impact their decision to join the company. Clear communication kills the grey area.ģ) Failing to communicate company culture expectations during the hiring process. You can’t blame anyone for operating within the grey area you’ve created. If pizza is the strongest rationale you have for being in the office, perhaps an office is not necessary for you after all.Ģ) Implicitly judging or penalising employees who choose not to work in the office. The worst things I see in company culture are when the employer:ġ) Attempting to lure employees back to the office with what I call “the pizza mousetrap”…incentives like "Pizza Thursdays" rather than being transparent about expectations and providing compelling reasons for working on-site. With a well-articulated company culture, employees can make informed decisions about whether it aligns with their values and needs, and engage in open dialogue with management.
✅ Clear communication is essential, as most people prefer clarity to ambiguity. ❌ The only wrong answer is a lack of clarity. The goal is not to achieve compliance through coercion - that’s a shitty way to lead - you want people to understand, agree and come with you out of choice. CEOs should avoid imposing their personal preferences without providing clear explanations for their expectations. Each company must consider its unique mission and reverse-engineer the optimal working conditions to achieve it. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to the question of whether employees should work from home or in the office. Working from home vs working from the office - Here's how we do it at Flight Story:
0 kommentar(er)
